Framing an evidence based decision about 21st CCLC: How do we see the value? DOWNLOAD In this policy commentary, we do some reasoning about how 21st CCLC produces value and discuss the limitations in one particular way of seeing that value – the intent-to-treat impact evaluation design. You Might Also Like Realist(ic) Evaluation Tools for OST Programs: The Quality-Outcomes Design and Methods (Q-ODM) Toolbox November 16, 2021 The multilevel person in context ~ neuroperson (MPCn) model: Guidance for quality improvement systems (QIS) focused on socio-emotional skill growth and transfer outcomes October 26, 2019 Quality accountability: Improving fidelity of broad developmentally focused interventions January 1, 2008 Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment * Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Post navigation Previous Previous post: Afterschool quality systemsNext Next post: Quality-outcomes study for Seattle Public Schools summer programs, 2016 program cycle
