Framing an evidence based decision about 21st CCLC: How do we see the value? DOWNLOAD In this policy commentary, we do some reasoning about how 21st CCLC produces value and discuss the limitations in one particular way of seeing that value – the intent-to-treat impact evaluation design. You Might Also Like Youth Voice and Climate Readiness in Schools October 13, 2023 Continuous quality improvement in afterschool settings: Impact findings from the Youth Program Quality Intervention study January 1, 2012 Quality at the point of service: profiles of practice in after-school settings April 24, 2010 Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment * Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Post navigation Previous Previous post: Afterschool quality systemsNext Next post: Quality-outcomes study for Seattle Public Schools summer programs, 2016 program cycle
