Quality-outcomes study for Seattle Public Schools summer programs, 2016 program cycle DOWNLOAD This paper compares outcomes for struggling students in high quality instructional settings to outcomes for similar students in low quality instructional settings. You Might Also Like Moving the needle on moving the needle: Next stage technical guidance for performance based accountability systems in the expanded learning field with a focus on performance levels for the quality of instructional services December 1, 2013 Framing an evidence based decision about 21st CCLC: How do we see the value? March 27, 2015 The multilevel person in context ~ neuroperson (MPCn) model: Guidance for quality improvement systems (QIS) focused on socio-emotional skill growth and transfer outcomes October 26, 2019 Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment * Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Post navigation Previous Previous post: Framing an evidence based decision about 21st CCLC: How do we see the value?Next Next post: Preparing youth to thrive: Methodology and findings from the social and emotional learning challenge
