Quality-outcomes study for Seattle Public Schools summer programs, 2016 program cycle DOWNLOAD This paper compares outcomes for struggling students in high quality instructional settings to outcomes for similar students in low quality instructional settings. You Might Also Like Linking after-school instructional practices to youth engagement: A pattern-centered approach January 1, 2010 Continuous quality improvement in afterschool settings: Impact findings from the Youth Program Quality Intervention study January 1, 2012 Measuring youth skills in expanded learning systems: Case study for reliability and validity of the YDEKC skill measures and technical guidance for local evaluators January 2, 2013 Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment * Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Post navigation Previous Previous post: Framing an evidence based decision about 21st CCLC: How do we see the value?Next Next post: Preparing youth to thrive: Methodology and findings from the social and emotional learning challenge
