Quality-outcomes study for Seattle Public Schools summer programs, 2016 program cycle DOWNLOAD This paper compares outcomes for struggling students in high quality instructional settings to outcomes for similar students in low quality instructional settings. You Might Also Like Continuous Improvement Theory and Methodology for Lower Stakes Accountability Models January 1, 2012 Afterschool quality systems December 23, 2014 Managing for positive youth development: Linking profiles of after-school program management to profiles of staff instructional performance November 17, 2012 Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment * Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Post navigation Previous Previous post: Framing an evidence based decision about 21st CCLC: How do we see the value?Next Next post: Preparing youth to thrive: Methodology and findings from the social and emotional learning challenge
